In the article “How to link personal values with team values,” authors Jaffe and Scott examine how companies such as Levi Strauss, AT&T, and Nordstrom conduct “values discussion” to mitigate conflicts and build a sense of togetherness for employees. They detail the process that these companies took to center their employees around company values and show the diversity of thought among their employees. One unique approach that I noticed was how the AT&T Southwest area managers held a workshop to explore their values. From the workshop, they were able to highlight how “different values were sometimes the root of work disagreements”(pg.5) and identify behaviors they wanted to see in their teams. I found this section to be especially applicable in team environments. Oftentimes, in roles of leadership, I can find myself in conflict with other people and how we approach problems. By understanding the values of one of my coworkers, I feel like I would be more considerate of varying perspectives and able to identify my personal biases when coming up with solutions. 

After finishing the reading and given time to reflect, I was reminded of something most students dread: group projects. Oftentimes as a student, I get a little nervous. I never know what to expect when being paired up with a random group of students from across campus. I realized that this conflict could have its roots in a difference of values. Some students are high-achievers and strive for perfection. Others want to be timely and have work done ahead of time. A handful of students value their social lives or work commitments over education. The mix and matching of values leads to students butting heads while all trying to score a passing grade. In the future I’ll try to be more understanding of the circumstances other students are in. 

“How to Link Personal Values with Team Values.” SlideShare, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/how-tolinkvalues-article/15146403. Accessed 3 Sep. 2025.

In the magazine article “Why Ethical People Make Unethical Choices,” author Ron Carucci explores the devastating consequences of ethical failures in the workplace, offering reasons as to why individuals sometimes make morally questionable decisions. Carucci argues that even when leaders possess “good intentions,” their actions can inadvertently create environments where unethical behavior not only emerges but thrives. He outlines five key reasons behind these ethical failures, including “excessive pressure” and the absence of strong role models, emphasizing how systemic issues within organizations contribute to poor individual choices.

Carucci uses real-world examples to illustrate each point, exemplifying his principles in preexisting workplace scenarios. These examples made his arguments especially relatable and impactful for me. Reflecting on my own experiences, I now recognize how organizational culture shapes individual behavior. When those at the top engage in unethical conduct, it sends a message that integrity is negotiable, prompting other employees to cut corners, hide issues, or make compromises in the name of preserving “order” or avoiding conflict. I’ll admit that, in the past, I chose to temporarily conceal problems to keep my former employer satisfied. I now recognize that my decision was influenced by the toxic culture at the time. Comparing several positions I have held, healthy work environments not only encourage honesty, but lowers stress and boosts productivity. Sometimes having integrity and working as a true team can lead to the most optimal outcomes, even if it comes with short-term delays or costs.

Ultimately, Carucci’s article highlights that unethical choices are rarely the result of personal failings alone. More often, they stem from organizational environments that encourage unethical choices. His analysis serves as a reminder that creating and maintaining ethical workplaces starts with its leadership.

“Why Ethical People Make Unethical Choices.” Harvard Business Review, 16 Dec. 2016. hbr.org, https://hbr.org/2016/12/why-ethical-people-make-unethical-choices.