One of the most interesting and valuable insights I gained from reading this article is the realization that there is no single way to approach moral problems. There are multiple, structured frameworks we can use to evaluate ethical decisions, each offering a unique lens. What stood out to me the most was the clear explanation of the five ethical approaches: the Utilitarian, Rights, Fairness/Justice, Common-Good, and Virtue approaches. Each of these methods presents a different way of thinking about what makes an action “right” or “wrong,” and together, they help form a comprehensive moral toolkit.

The approach that particularly resonated with me was the Virtue Approach. Rather than focusing on outcomes (like utilitarianism) or individual rights, this method emphasizes the kind of person one should strive to be. It encourages self-reflection and personal growth by asking, “What kind of person will this action help me become?” This was eye-opening for me because we often think of ethics as something external, rules, consequences, or obligations. The Virtue Approach shifts the focus inward, asking us to develop qualities like honesty, courage, and compassion not just for specific situations, but as part of our daily character. It reminded me that ethical behavior isn’t only about making the “right call” in tough moments but instead, it’s about cultivating habits of goodness that shape how we act all the time.

Another key takeaway was the emphasis on getting the facts before forming an ethical judgment. This step seems obvious, but as the article notes, it’s often ignored. Many moral controversies could be resolved, or at least better understood, if people took the time to fully understand the situation before reacting. It reminded me how important it is to slow down and think critically, especially in a world of fast news, social media, and quick opinions.

Overall, this article helped me realize that ethical decision-making isn’t just a gut feeling or a matter of opinion; it can be thoughtful, systematic, and grounded in well-established philosophical traditions. Each approach has strengths and weaknesses, and no one method will always provide a clear answer. But by considering all five, we’re more likely to make balanced, respectful, and just choices. This framework is something I’ll definitely carry with me in future situations where ethics and values are at stake.

Velasquez, Manuel, et al. “Thinking Ethically.” Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, 1 Aug. 2015, www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/thinking-ethically/